VTeX: Solutions for Science Publishing logo


  • List of journals
  • Browse subjects
  • About Publisher
  • Help
  • Sitemap
Login Register

  1. Home
  2. Journals
  3. VMSTA
  4. To appear
  5. Average Precision at Cutoff k under Rand ...

Modern Stochastics: Theory and Applications

Submit your article Information Become a Peer-reviewer
  • Article info
  • Full article
  • More
    Article info Full article

Average Precision at Cutoff k under Random Rankings: Expectation and Variance
Crossmark link logo suggesting to check for updates
Tetiana Manzhos ORCID icon link to view author Tetiana Manzhos details   Tetiana Ianevych ORCID icon link to view author Tetiana Ianevych details   Olga Melnyk ORCID icon link to view author Olga Melnyk details  

Authors

 
Placeholder
https://doi.org/10.15559/26-VMSTA298
Pub. online: 2 January 2026      Type: Research Article      Open accessOpen Access

Received
2 November 2025
Accepted
28 February 2026
Published
2 January 2026

Notes

This paper is dedicated to the 85th anniversary of the birth of Prof. Yuriy Kozachenko.

Abstract

Recommender systems and information retrieval platforms rely on ranking algorithms to present the most relevant items to users, thereby improving engagement and satisfaction. Assessing the quality of these rankings requires reliable evaluation metrics. Among them, Mean Average Precision at cutoff k (MAP@k) is widely used, as it accounts for both the relevance of items and their positions in the list for some groups of users.
It seems obvious that intelligent ranking algorithms should outperform recommendations generated at random. But how can we measure how much better they work? In this article, we have established the expected value and variance of the average accuracy at k (AP@k), as they can be used as a foundation for efficiency criteria for MAP@k. Here, we considered two widely used evaluation models: offline and online, together with corresponding randomization models for them, and calculated the expected value and variance of AP@k in both cases. The numerical study for different scenarios was also performed.

References

[1] 
Agarwal, D.K. , Chen, B.-C. : Evaluation Methods pp. 55–78. Cambridge University Press (2016)
[2] 
Bestgen, Y. : Exact expected average precision of the random baseline for system evaluation. The Prague Bulletin of Mathematical Linguistics 103, 131–138 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1515/pralin-2015-0007
[3] 
Boas, R.P. , Wrench, J.W. : Partial sums of the harmonic series. The American Mathematical Monthly 78(8), 864–870 (1971). MR0289994. https://doi.org/10.2307/2316476
[4] 
Brin, S. , Page, L. : The anatomy of a large-scale hypertextual web search engine. In: Proceedings of the Seventh International Conference on World Wide Web, pp. 107–117. Elsevier Science Publishers B. V. (1998). https://snap.stanford.edu/class/cs224w-readings/Brin98Anatomy.pdf
[5] 
Engström, C. , Silvestrov, S. : Pagerank for networks, graphs and markov chains. Theory of Probability and Mathematical Statistics 96, 61–83 (2017). MR3666872. https://doi.org/10.1090/tpms/1034
[6] 
Gebremeskel, G.G. , de Vries, A.P. : Recommender systems evaluations: Offline, online, time and a/a test. In: Balog, K. , Cappellato L, F.N.M.C. (eds.) Working Notes of CLEF 2016 – Conference and Labs of the Evaluation Forum. CEUR Workshop Proceedings, vol. 1609, pp. 642–656 (2016). https://ceur-ws.org/Vol-1609/16090642.pdf
[7] 
Jadon, A. , Patil, A. : A Comprehensive Survey of Evaluation Techniques for Recommendation Systems (2024). https://arxiv.org/abs/2312.16015
[8] 
Knuth, D.E. : Harmonic numbers 1st edn. pp. 73–78. Addison-Wesley (1968)
[9] 
Valcarce, D. , Bellogín, A. , Parapar, J. , Castells, P. : Assessing ranking metrics in top-n recommendation. Information Retrieval Journal 23(4), 411–448 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10791-020-09377-x

Full article PDF XML
Full article PDF XML

Copyright
© 2026 The Author(s). Published by VTeX
by logo by logo
Open access article under the CC BY license.

Keywords
Recommendation systems Information retrieval Ranking algorithms AP@k MAP@k Evaluation metrics Expectation and variance Random rankings

MSC2020
60E05 60C05 62R07 68T05

Funding
The second author, Tetiana Ianevych, was supported by the Ministry of Education and Science of Ukraine within the grant for the prospective development of the scientific field “Mathematical Sciences and Natural Sciences” at Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv.

Metrics
since February 2017
0

Article info
views

0

Full article
views

0

PDF
downloads

0

XML
downloads

Export citation

Copy and paste formatted citation
Placeholder

Download citation in file


Share


RSS

  • About Publisher
Powered by PubliMill  •  Privacy policy